giving: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	thing Weight: 0.60 , topic Weight: 0.54 , issue Weight: 0.49 , service Weight: 0.48 , information Weight: 0.47
Siblings	talking Weight: 0.32 , let Weight: 0.32 , turning Weight: 0.32 , free time Weight: 0.31 , finding Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96
be to poor good	0.82
be to good	0.82
is bad thing	0.79
is bad luck	0.76
feel good	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(giving, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(finding, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(giving, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(talking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(talking, has quality good)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(finding, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(finding, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(talking, is bad thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(talking, is bad thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(giving, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(giving, has quality good)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(giving, is bad luck)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.43

Salient(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Salient(giving, is bad luck)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(giving, is bad luck)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(giving, is bad luck)

...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Salient(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(giving, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(talking, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(finding, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(talking, is bad thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

Typical(giving, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(service, has quality good)