giving: be to poor good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.54
, issue
Weight: 0.49
, service
Weight: 0.48
, information
Weight: 0.47
Siblings talking
Weight: 0.32
, let
Weight: 0.32
, turning
Weight: 0.32
, free time
Weight: 0.31
, finding
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to poor good 1.00
be to good 0.88
has quality bad 0.82
has quality good 0.82
feel good 0.80
is bad luck 0.76
is bad thing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(giving, be to poor good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(finding, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(talking, is bad thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(giving, be to poor good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(talking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(finding, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(finding, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(talking, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(talking, is bad thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(giving, be to poor good)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(giving, is bad luck)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(giving, be to good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(giving, is bad luck)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(giving, is bad luck)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(giving, is bad luck)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(giving, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(giving, feel good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(giving, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(giving, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(giving, is bad thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(giving, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(giving, be to good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(giving, is bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(giving, is bad thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(giving, is bad thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(giving, feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(giving, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(giving, be to good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(giving, feel good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(giving, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(giving, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(giving, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to poor good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(giving, be to poor good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(talking, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(talking, is bad thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(finding, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(giving, be to poor good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)