hermes: has physical part bags

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.67
, god
Weight: 0.61
, name
Weight: 0.58
, store
Weight: 0.54
Siblings burberry
Weight: 0.36
, chanel
Weight: 0.36
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.35
, volvo
Weight: 0.35
, subaru
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part bags 1.00
have expensive bags 0.89
have investment bags 0.84
have costly bags 0.83
be birkin expensive bag 0.82
was associated with bag of money 0.82
was associated with bag 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hermes, has physical part bags)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hermes, have costly bags)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have investment bags)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(hermes, have investment bags)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hermes, have investment bags)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hermes, have costly bags)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(hermes, have investment bags)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, has physical part bags)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(hermes, has physical part bags)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hermes, has physical part bags)