hermes: have expensive bags

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.67
, god
Weight: 0.61
, name
Weight: 0.58
, store
Weight: 0.54
Siblings burberry
Weight: 0.36
, chanel
Weight: 0.36
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.35
, volvo
Weight: 0.35
, subaru
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have expensive bags 1.00
have costly bags 0.94
be birkin expensive bag 0.92
has physical part bags 0.89
have investment bags 0.86
was associated with bag of money 0.82
was associated with bag 0.80
have expensive handbags 0.80
be birkin expensive 0.79
is expensive 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(brand, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brand, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(subaru, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chanel, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mercedes benz, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(burberry, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(volvo, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(brand, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(volvo, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(volvo, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(burberry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(burberry, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mercedes benz, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mercedes benz, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chanel, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chanel, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(subaru, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(subaru, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hermes, have expensive bags)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hermes, have costly bags)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hermes, have costly bags)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have investment bags)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive handbags)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(hermes, have investment bags)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(hermes, have expensive handbags)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hermes, have investment bags)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(hermes, have expensive handbags)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(hermes, have investment bags)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(hermes, have expensive handbags)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hermes, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hermes, is expensive)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(hermes, is expensive)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(hermes, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(volvo, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(burberry, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chanel, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(subaru, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mercedes benz, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brand, is expensive)