hermes: was associated with bag

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.67
, god
Weight: 0.61
, name
Weight: 0.58
, store
Weight: 0.54
Siblings burberry
Weight: 0.36
, chanel
Weight: 0.36
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.35
, volvo
Weight: 0.35
, subaru
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was associated with bag 1.00
was associated with bag of money 0.97
be birkin expensive bag 0.87
has physical part bags 0.82
have expensive bags 0.80
have costly bags 0.76
was related to miaia 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(hermes, was associated with bag)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hermes, has physical part bags)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(hermes, have costly bags)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hermes, have costly bags)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(hermes, have costly bags)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(hermes, be birkin expensive bag)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hermes, was associated with bag of money)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hermes, have expensive bags)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hermes, have costly bags)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hermes, was related to miaia)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hermes, was related to miaia)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hermes, was related to miaia)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(hermes, was related to miaia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(hermes, was associated with bag)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(hermes, was associated with bag) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hermes, was associated with bag)