integrated circuit: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, circuit
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.51
Siblings circuit breaker
Weight: 0.39
, network device
Weight: 0.36
, module
Weight: 0.36
, diode
Weight: 0.34
, computer network
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
is high quality 0.86
has quality worse 0.84
has quality cost 0.82
is higher quality 0.80
has quality availability 0.78
has quality question 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(diode, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(diode, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(diode, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(diode, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(computer network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(computer network, is quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(diode, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(diode, is quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(computer network, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality question)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(integrated circuit, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality question)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(computer network, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(diode, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(diode, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)