circuit: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents circuit breaker
Weight: 0.76
, integrated circuit
Weight: 0.75
, function
Weight: 0.58
, structure
Weight: 0.57
Siblings timer
Weight: 0.61
, module
Weight: 0.61
, attenuator
Weight: 0.60
, filter
Weight: 0.59
, flip flop
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality worse 0.87
go bad 0.79
be considered bad 0.78
has quality difference 0.77
has quality question 0.76
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(circuit breaker, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, go bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(flip flop, be considered bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(timer, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(circuit breaker, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(timer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(timer, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(filter, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(flip flop, be considered bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(flip flop, be considered bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(circuit, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, go bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flip flop, be considered bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(timer, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(filter, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, go bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality questions)