circuit breaker: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents short circuit
Weight: 0.68
, electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, device
Weight: 0.64
, circuit
Weight: 0.62
Siblings integrated circuit
Weight: 0.39
, network device
Weight: 0.34
, thermistor
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
has quality question 0.92
has quality good 0.76
has quality better 0.76
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(short circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(microprocessor, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(short circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(microprocessor, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(microprocessor, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(circuit breaker, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality questions)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(microprocessor, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(short circuit, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)