integrated circuit: has quality question

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, circuit
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.51
Siblings circuit breaker
Weight: 0.39
, network device
Weight: 0.36
, module
Weight: 0.36
, diode
Weight: 0.34
, computer network
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality question 1.00
has quality questions 0.92
has quality good 0.77
has quality bad 0.76
has quality better 0.76
is quality 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(diode, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(diode, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality questions)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(computer network, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(computer network, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality questions)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(computer network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(computer network, is quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(diode, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(diode, is quality)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(diode, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(diode, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(integrated circuit, has quality question)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(integrated circuit, has quality questions)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality questions)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality question)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(computer network, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(diode, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(diode, is quality)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)