integrated circuit: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, circuit
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.51
Siblings circuit breaker
Weight: 0.39
, network device
Weight: 0.36
, module
Weight: 0.36
, diode
Weight: 0.34
, computer network
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
has quality question 0.92
has quality good 0.76
is quality 0.76
has quality better 0.76
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality questions)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality questions)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(diode, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(diode, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(computer network, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality questions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(computer network, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(computer network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(computer network, is quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(circuit breaker, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit breaker, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(diode, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(diode, is quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(diode, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(diode, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(integrated circuit, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality question)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality question)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(computer network, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality questions)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(diode, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(diode, is quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(circuit breaker, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(integrated circuit, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)