filter: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.64
, channel
Weight: 0.62
, circuit
Weight: 0.59
, source
Weight: 0.58
Siblings oil filter
Weight: 0.80
, diffuser
Weight: 0.47
, stream
Weight: 0.33
, light source
Weight: 0.33
, integrated circuit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality worth 0.85
has quality worse 0.84
is great 0.81
has quality news 0.79
has quality question 0.77
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(filter, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(filter, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(filter, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(filter, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(filter, has quality good)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(circuit, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(circuit, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diffuser, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(light source, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(diffuser, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(stream, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(filter, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(circuit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(filter, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(filter, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(filter, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(filter, has quality good)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(integrated circuit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(diffuser, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(diffuser, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(light source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(light source, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(stream, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(stream, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(diffuser, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(diffuser, has quality better)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(filter, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(filter, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(channel, has quality news)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(light source, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(diffuser, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(diffuser, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(diffuser, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, has quality good)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(circuit, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(filter, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
...