internet: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web browser
Weight: 0.70
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.67
, network device
Weight: 0.66
, computer network
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.64
Siblings web page
Weight: 0.36
, web
Weight: 0.36
, web site
Weight: 0.36
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is audio quality bad 0.81
has quality evil 0.80
go bad 0.79
sound bad 0.79
is uis bad 0.77
has quality question 0.76
be bad playing 0.76
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(internet, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(internet, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(internet, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(internet, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(internet, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(internet, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(internet, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, is uis bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(internet, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(computer network, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(internet, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(internet, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(web browser, be bad playing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(internet, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(web browser, be bad playing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, is uis bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(web browser, be bad playing)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(forum, is uis bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality questions)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, is uis bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(computer network, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(web browser, be bad playing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(internet, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(internet, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(internet, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(internet, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality question)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(web browser, be bad playing)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality questions)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(forum, is uis bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(web, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality question)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(web browser, be bad playing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality questions)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(internet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(forum, is uis bad)