internet: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web browser
Weight: 0.70
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.67
, network device
Weight: 0.66
, computer network
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.64
Siblings web page
Weight: 0.36
, web
Weight: 0.36
, web site
Weight: 0.36
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is great 0.81
is audio quality bad 0.80
has quality evil 0.78
has quality question 0.77
has quality questions 0.76
is best 0.76
is really popular 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(internet, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(internet, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(internet, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(internet, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(internet, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(internet, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(web browser, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(internet, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(internet, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(computer network, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(internet, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(internet, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(web browser, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality question)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(web browser, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(web browser, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(web browser, is best)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality questions)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(network device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(web browser, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(forum, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(web browser, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(computer network, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer network, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(web, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(web, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(internet, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(internet, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(internet, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(internet, has quality bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(internet, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality question)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality questions)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(web browser, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(web, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(web, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(network device, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(forum, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(web browser, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality question)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality questions)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(internet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(web browser, is best)