kenya: is developed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents africa
Weight: 0.64
, nation
Weight: 0.57
, country
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.54
Siblings south africa
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, zambia
Weight: 0.35
, zimbabwe
Weight: 0.35
, nigeria
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is developed 1.00
is econically developed country 0.91
is developed country 0.91
is low developed country 0.86
is low econically developed country 0.86
is less developed country 0.85
is developing 0.84
is economically developed country 0.79
be considered developing country 0.78
is low economically developed country 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(africa, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(kenya, is developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(africa, is developing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(africa, is developing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(africa, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(kenya, is developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(latin america, is developed)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(south africa, is developed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is developing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(zambia, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(kenya, is developed)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(kenya, is econically developed country)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(kenya, is econically developed country)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(kenya, is low econically developed country)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(kenya, is low econically developed country)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(kenya, is developed country)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is low econically developed country)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(kenya, is low econically developed country)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(kenya, is less developed country)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed country)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(kenya, is low developed country)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(kenya, is developed country)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(kenya, is economically developed country)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(kenya, is economically developed country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(kenya, is less developed country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(kenya, is low economically developed country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(kenya, is low economically developed country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(kenya, is developed country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is economically developed country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(kenya, is less developed country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is low developed country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(kenya, is developing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(kenya, is economically developed country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is low economically developed country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is less developed country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(kenya, is low economically developed country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(kenya, is low developed country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(kenya, is low developed country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(kenya, is developing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(kenya, is developing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(kenya, be considered developing country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be considered developing country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(kenya, be considered developing country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(kenya, be considered developing country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(kenya, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(africa, is developing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(zambia, is developing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is developing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(kenya, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(africa, is developing)