kenya: is developing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents africa
Weight: 0.64
, nation
Weight: 0.57
, country
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.54
Siblings south africa
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, zambia
Weight: 0.35
, zimbabwe
Weight: 0.35
, nigeria
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is developing 1.00
is developing country 0.93
be considered developing country 0.89
is developed 0.84
is econically developed country 0.81
is developed country 0.81
develop country 0.79
is low developed country 0.79
is low econically developed country 0.79
is less developed country 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(africa, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(kenya, is developing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(africa, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(kenya, is developing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(africa, is developing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(africa, is developing country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(africa, is developing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(africa, is developing country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(zambia, is developing country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(south africa, is developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(africa, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(kenya, is developing)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(africa, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(kenya, is developing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is developing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(zambia, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(zimbabwe, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, is developing country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(zambia, is developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(zambia, is developing country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(latin america, is developed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(zimbabwe, be considered developing country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(south africa, is developed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(south africa, is developed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(kenya, is developing)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(kenya, is econically developed country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(kenya, is econically developed country)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(kenya, is low econically developed country)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(kenya, is low econically developed country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(kenya, is econically developed country)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is econically developed country)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is low econically developed country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(kenya, is low econically developed country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, be considered developing country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(kenya, is developing country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(kenya, is less developed country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(kenya, is less developed country)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(kenya, is less developed country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(kenya, is developing country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(kenya, is developed country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(kenya, is low developed country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(kenya, be considered developing country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(kenya, is developing country)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is low developed country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(kenya, is developed country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(kenya, is developed country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is less developed country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(kenya, be considered developing country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(kenya, is low developed country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(kenya, is low developed country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(kenya, is developed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(kenya, be considered developing country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(kenya, develop country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(kenya, develop country)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(kenya, is developed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(kenya, develop country)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(kenya, develop country)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developed)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(kenya, is developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(kenya, is developing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(africa, is developing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(africa, is developing country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(zambia, is developing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is developing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, is developing country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(zambia, is developing country)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(south africa, is developed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(zimbabwe, be considered developing country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(africa, is developing)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(kenya, is developing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(africa, is developing country)