killing: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents atrocity
Weight: 0.64
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, act
Weight: 0.58
, violence
Weight: 0.56
Siblings homicide
Weight: 0.65
, honor killing
Weight: 0.38
, murder
Weight: 0.37
, kidnapping
Weight: 0.35
, first degree murder
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
make impact on environment 0.83
make positive impact on environment 0.83
harm environment 0.82
be bad for economy 0.82
be bad for society 0.81
has quality bad 0.80
be bad thing 0.80
is bad thing 0.79
be good for society 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(killing, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(killing, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(crime, be bad for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(killing, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(activity, make positive impact on environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(killing, be bad for environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(killing, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be good for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(killing, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(crime, be good for society)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(activity, make positive impact on environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(violence, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(crime, be bad for society)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(act, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(crime, be bad for society)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(crime, be good for society)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(violence, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(act, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(activity, make positive impact on environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(homicide, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(murder, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(kidnapping, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(act, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(killing, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(killing, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(activity, make positive impact on environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(killing, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(crime, be bad for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(killing, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(violence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(killing, be bad for environment)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be good for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(killing, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(kidnapping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(kidnapping, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(murder, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(murder, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(homicide, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(homicide, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(killing, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad thing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(killing, be bad thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(killing, be bad thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(killing, be bad thing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(killing, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(killing, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(killing, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(killing, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(killing, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(activity, make positive impact on environment)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(violence, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(crime, be bad for society)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(crime, be good for society)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(homicide, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(kidnapping, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(murder, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(activity, make positive impact on environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(crime, be good for society)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(violence, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(crime, be bad for society)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(killing, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(act, has quality bad)