listening: as natural skills of language

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, time
Weight: 0.54
, experience
Weight: 0.54
, activity
Weight: 0.52
Siblings loud music
Weight: 0.34
, talking
Weight: 0.34
, living thing
Weight: 0.33
, communicating
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
as natural skills of language 1.00
is skills 0.89
have skills 0.89
have important skills 0.88
is communication skill 0.81
is important communication skill 0.81
is is skill 0.81
is language classroom 0.79
is leadership skill 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(listening, as natural skills of language)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(listening, have skills)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(listening, have important skills)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(listening, is skills)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(listening, have skills)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(listening, is important communication skill)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(listening, is language classroom)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(listening, is is skill)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(listening, is communication skill)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(listening, is leadership skill)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(listening, is skills)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(listening, have skills)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(listening, is skills)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(listening, is communication skill)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(listening, have important skills)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(listening, is is skill)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(listening, is communication skill)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(listening, is important communication skill)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(listening, is language classroom)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(listening, have skills)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(listening, is leadership skill)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(listening, is communication skill)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(listening, is skills)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(listening, have important skills)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(listening, is is skill)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(listening, is leadership skill)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(listening, is important communication skill)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(listening, is language classroom)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(listening, is is skill)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(listening, have important skills)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(listening, is leadership skill)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(listening, is important communication skill)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(listening, is language classroom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(listening, as natural skills of language)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(listening, as natural skills of language)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(listening, as natural skills of language)