motel: be at new york

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, room
Weight: 0.59
, business
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hotel room
Weight: 0.37
, laundry room
Weight: 0.36
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at new york 1.00
be at new york city 0.97
be at chicago 0.75
be at boston 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(motel, be at new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(motel, be at new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(motel, be at new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(motel, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)