seafood restaurant: be at new york

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, business
Weight: 0.59
, attraction
Weight: 0.57
, beach
Weight: 0.54
Siblings grill
Weight: 0.59
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.41
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at new york 1.00
be at new york city 0.97
be at chicago 0.75
be at boston 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(seafood restaurant, be at new york)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at boston)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at new york)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)