seafood restaurant: be at boston

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.81
, business
Weight: 0.59
, attraction
Weight: 0.57
, beach
Weight: 0.54
Siblings grill
Weight: 0.59
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.41
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at boston 1.00
be at chicago 0.81
be at michigan 0.80
be at florida 0.79
be at america 0.77
be at texas 0.76
be at berkeley 0.76
be at brighton mass 0.75
be at new york 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at boston)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at brighton mass)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be at texas)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at new york)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(restaurant, be at berkeley)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at america)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at america)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be at new york)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(steakhouse, be at michigan)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be at michigan)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be at new york)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(steakhouse, be at florida)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be at florida)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(steakhouse, be at texas)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be at texas)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(steakhouse, be at brighton mass)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be at brighton mass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(seafood restaurant, be at boston)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at new york)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(seafood restaurant, be at new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at boston)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at berkeley)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at chicago)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at florida)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at michigan)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at america)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at texas)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be at brighton mass)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be at new york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be at new york)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(seafood restaurant, be at boston)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(restaurant, be at berkeley)