pbs: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents network
Weight: 0.59
, television show
Weight: 0.58
, television station
Weight: 0.57
, distributor
Weight: 0.54
, show
Weight: 0.54
Siblings pb
Weight: 0.32
, computer network
Weight: 0.31
, cartoon network
Weight: 0.31
, smallville
Weight: 0.31
, talk show
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
is quality 0.83
has quality better 0.83
has quality bad 0.82
has quality price 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pbs, has quality worth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(distributor, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pbs, has quality worth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(network, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pbs, has quality worth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(distributor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pbs, has quality worth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(network, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pbs, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(network, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(network, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(distributor, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(show, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(distributor, has quality price)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(distributor, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(network, has quality better)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(show, is quality)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(network, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(smallville, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smallville, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(computer network, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(network, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pbs, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(show, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pbs, has quality worth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(network, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pbs, has quality worth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(distributor, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pbs, has quality worth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(distributor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pbs, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(computer network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(computer network, is quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(smallville, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(smallville, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cartoon network, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, is quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(talk show, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(talk show, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(smallville, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(smallville, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cartoon network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(cartoon network, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(pbs, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pbs, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(network, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(network, has quality better)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(distributor, has quality price)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(distributor, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(show, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(talk show, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(computer network, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(smallville, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(smallville, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cartoon network, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cartoon network, is quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(network, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(network, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(show, is quality)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(distributor, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(pbs, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(distributor, has quality price)