pharmacy: has quality better

Related concepts

Parents	shop Weight: 0.64 , food store Weight: 0.64 , location Weight: 0.63 , field Weight: 0.62
Siblings	grocery store Weight: 0.39 , convenience store Weight: 0.37 , supermarket Weight: 0.36 , clothing store Weight: 0.36 , hardware store Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality better	1.00
has quality good	0.94
has quality bad	0.90
has quality wrong	0.83
has quality services	0.80
be cheaper than others	0.75
be good for business	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(pharmacy, has quality better)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(location, be good for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(pharmacy, has quality better)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(location, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(pharmacy, has quality better)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(food store, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(pharmacy, has quality better)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(location, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(pharmacy, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(food store, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(field, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(location, has quality wrong)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(location, has quality services)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(location, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(food store, has quality bad)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(location, has quality wrong)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(field, has quality good)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(location, be good for business)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(location, has quality services)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(supermarket, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(pharmacy, has quality better)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(food store, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(pharmacy, has quality better)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(location, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(pharmacy, has quality better)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(location, has quality services) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(pharmacy, has quality better)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(location, be good for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(pharmacy, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(supermarket, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(supermarket, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(pharmacy, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(pharmacy, be cheaper than others)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(pharmacy, be cheaper than others)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(pharmacy, be cheaper than others)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, be cheaper than others)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Salient(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(pharmacy, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(food store, has quality bad)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(location, has quality wrong)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(location, has quality services)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(field, has quality good)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(location, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(supermarket, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(field, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(food store, has quality bad)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(location, has quality wrong)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(location, has quality services)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.86

Typical(pharmacy, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(location, be good for business)