plastic: be worse than paper

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.72
, type
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, electronic device
Weight: 0.57
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.76
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.72
, acrylic
Weight: 0.66
, silicone
Weight: 0.66
, trash bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse than paper 1.00
be stronger than paper 0.89
be worse than glass 0.86
be better than wood 0.79
be better than metal 0.78
be stronger than glass 0.76
be cheaper than metal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(acrylic, be better than wood)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(acrylic, be better than wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(plastic, be worse than paper)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(plastic, be better than wood)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(plastic, be stronger than paper)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than wood)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(plastic, be better than wood)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than wood)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(plastic, be worse than glass)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(plastic, be cheaper than metal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(plastic, be stronger than glass)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(plastic, be better than metal)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic, be better than metal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(plastic, be better than metal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be better than metal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be worse than paper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(plastic, be worse than paper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be worse than paper)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(acrylic, be better than wood)