produce: be much more expensive than junk food

Related concepts

Parents	fresh food Weight: 0.60 , department Weight: 0.54 , cause Weight: 0.54 , ingredient Weight: 0.52
Siblings	raw material Weight: 0.66 , berry Weight: 0.60 , paddy Weight: 0.41 , fresh fruit Weight: 0.33 , fruit Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be much more expensive than junk food	1.00
be more healthier than junk foods	0.91
be better than food	0.86
be more expensive than non-local	0.85
be more expensive than vegetables	0.84
is more expensive	0.84
be considered better than packaged food	0.80
be healthier than candy	0.80
be better than frozen food	0.80
be much better tasting than food	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(fresh food, be better than frozen food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(fresh food, be better than food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(fresh food, be much better tasting than food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(fresh food, be considered better than packaged food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(fresh food, be better than food)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(fresh food, be considered better than packaged food)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(fresh food, be better than frozen food)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be better than food)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be better than frozen food)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be considered better than packaged food)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(fruit, be healthier than candy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(fresh food, be better than food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(fresh food, be better than frozen food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.21

Plausible(fresh food, be much better tasting than food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(fresh food, be considered better than packaged food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(fruit, be healthier than candy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(fruit, be healthier than candy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Remarkable(produce, be more expensive than non-local)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(produce, be more expensive than non-local)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(produce, be more expensive than non-local)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(produce, be more expensive than non-local)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(produce, is more expensive)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(produce, is more expensive)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(produce, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(fresh food, be better than food)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(fresh food, be considered better than packaged food)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(fresh food, be better than frozen food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(fruit, be healthier than candy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(fresh food, be better than food)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(fresh food, be considered better than packaged food)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(fresh food, be much better tasting than food)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(fresh food, be better than frozen food)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.39

Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)