produce: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.60
, department
Weight: 0.54
, cause
Weight: 0.54
, ingredient
Weight: 0.52
Siblings raw material
Weight: 0.66
, berry
Weight: 0.60
, paddy
Weight: 0.41
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.33
, fruit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is more expensive 0.94
be more expensive than non-local 0.88
is really expensive 0.87
is cheaper 0.85
is inexpensive 0.81
be expensive in hawaii 0.79
is cheap 0.79
be much more expensive than junk food 0.79
be more expensive than vegetables 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fresh food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(produce, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(produce, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(produce, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(berry, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fresh food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(produce, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(produce, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(produce, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(fresh fruit, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(berry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(berry, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(produce, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(produce, is more expensive)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(produce, is more expensive)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(produce, be more expensive than non-local)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(produce, be more expensive than non-local)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(produce, be more expensive than non-local)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(produce, be more expensive than non-local)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(produce, be expensive in hawaii)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(produce, be expensive in hawaii)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(produce, is cheap)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(produce, is cheap)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(produce, be expensive in hawaii)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(produce, is cheap)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in hawaii)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(produce, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(produce, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(produce, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fresh food, is cheaper)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fresh food, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(berry, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fresh food, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(produce, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fresh food, is cheaper)