prolog: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.65
, programming language
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, logic
Weight: 0.49
, system
Weight: 0.40
Siblings english language
Weight: 0.33
, chinese language
Weight: 0.33
, italian language
Weight: 0.33
, sql
Weight: 0.33
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
is good for 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(logic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(prolog, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(prolog, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(prolog, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(logic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(prolog, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(logic, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(logic, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(language, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(logic, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(logic, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sql, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(english language, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sql, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(logic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(prolog, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(prolog, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(prolog, has quality better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(logic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(prolog, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(sql, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sql, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(english language, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(english language, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(sql, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sql, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(prolog, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(prolog, has quality good)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(prolog, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prolog, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(prolog, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(prolog, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(prolog, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(prolog, is good for)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(prolog, is good for)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(prolog, is good for)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(prolog, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(logic, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(logic, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sql, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sql, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(english language, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(logic, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(logic, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(prolog, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)