prolog: is good for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.65
, programming language
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, logic
Weight: 0.49
, system
Weight: 0.40
Siblings english language
Weight: 0.33
, chinese language
Weight: 0.33
, italian language
Weight: 0.33
, sql
Weight: 0.33
, haitian creole
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good for 1.00
has quality good 0.86
has quality bad 0.82
has quality better 0.79
is hard 0.76
is findall 0.75
is bagof 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(prolog, is good for)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(logic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(prolog, is good for)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(prolog, is good for)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(language, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(prolog, is good for)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(prolog, is good for)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(logic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(prolog, is good for)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(logic, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(logic, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(language, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(language, is hard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(logic, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(logic, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(language, is hard)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sql, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(english language, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(english language, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sql, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(chinese language, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sql, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(logic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(prolog, is good for)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(prolog, is good for)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(prolog, is good for)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(language, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(prolog, is good for)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(prolog, is good for)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(logic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(prolog, is good for)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(english language, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(english language, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(sql, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sql, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(sql, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sql, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(sql, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(sql, is hard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(chinese language, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chinese language, is hard)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(english language, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(english language, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(prolog, is good for)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(prolog, is bagof)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(prolog, is findall)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(prolog, is findall)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(prolog, is bagof)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(prolog, is findall)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(prolog, is bagof)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prolog, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(prolog, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(prolog, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(prolog, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(prolog, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(prolog, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(prolog, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is findall)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(prolog, is hard)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(prolog, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(prolog, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(prolog, is hard)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(prolog, is hard)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is hard)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prolog, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is bagof)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(prolog, is good for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(logic, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(logic, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(language, is hard)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sql, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sql, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sql, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chinese language, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(english language, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(english language, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(logic, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(logic, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(language, is hard)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(prolog, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is hard)