rat: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.70
, rodent
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.65
Siblings kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.56
, cockroach
Weight: 0.37
, rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, monkey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
has physical part vibrissae 0.83
has physical part claws 0.83
has physical part whiskers 0.82
has physical part teeth 0.82
has physical part hair 0.82
has physical part caecum 0.81
has physical part ears 0.81
has physical part horns 0.80
has physical part testicles 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(rodent, has physical part testicles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part testicles)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part testicles)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(rat, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rodent, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(rat, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(rat, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(rodent, has physical part testicles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(rat, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(rat, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(monkey, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(rat, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(rat, has physical part whiskers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part whiskers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(rat, has physical part whiskers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part whiskers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part caecum)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(rat, has physical part caecum)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part caecum)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(rat, has physical part caecum)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(rat, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part testicles)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monkey, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(kangaroo rat, has physical part ears)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part ears)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part testicles)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(rat, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)