red fox: have sharp teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have sharp teeth 1.00
have sharp claws 0.90
has physical part teeth 0.86
has physical part claws 0.79
have whiskers on legs 0.77
has physical part whiskers 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(red fox, have sharp teeth)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fox, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(red fox, have sharp teeth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fox, have sharp claws)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(fox, have sharp claws)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(fox, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red fox, have sharp teeth)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red fox, have sharp teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(red fox, have sharp teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(red fox, have sharp claws)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, have sharp claws)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(red fox, have sharp claws)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have sharp claws)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(red fox, have sharp teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fox, have sharp claws)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(fox, have sharp claws)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(red fox, have sharp teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)