sanction: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents penalty
Weight: 0.67
, tool
Weight: 0.61
, punishment
Weight: 0.60
, option
Weight: 0.58
Siblings suspension
Weight: 0.75
, dismissal
Weight: 0.69
, contempt
Weight: 0.66
, imprisonment
Weight: 0.65
, ban
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality right 0.90
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality worth 0.85
is great 0.81
is good thing 0.78
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(punishment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tool, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(punishment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(penalty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(punishment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(punishment, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(punishment, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(punishment, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(penalty, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(punishment, has quality right)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(punishment, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(option, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(punishment, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(punishment, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tool, is great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tool, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(punishment, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(punishment, has quality right)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(penalty, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(punishment, has quality wrong)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(option, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(punishment, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tool, is best)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(punishment, is good thing)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(suspension, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(punishment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(punishment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(option, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(penalty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(punishment, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(punishment, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tool, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(punishment, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(imprisonment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(imprisonment, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(suspension, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(suspension, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(suspension, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(suspension, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(suspension, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(suspension, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(sanction, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(sanction, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sanction, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sanction, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(punishment, is good thing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality right)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(penalty, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality wrong)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is great)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(imprisonment, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(suspension, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(suspension, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(suspension, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(penalty, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality right)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(punishment, is good thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(punishment, has quality wrong)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is great)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sanction, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is best)