sandwich: taste better squished

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, snack
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.69
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.68
, burrito
Weight: 0.66
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, dessert
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste better squished 1.00
taste squished 0.99
taste good 0.78
taste better in triangles 0.77
taste better cut 0.76
cut taste better 0.76
cut diagonally taste better 0.76
taste better cut diagonally 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cheeseburger, taste good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(cheeseburger, taste good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cheeseburger, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better squished)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste squished)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste squished)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste squished)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste squished)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better cut)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste better cut diagonally)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut taste better)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(sandwich, cut diagonally taste better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sandwich, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better squished)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better squished)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better squished)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cheeseburger, taste good)