science: be used in technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vocation
Weight: 0.62
, core
Weight: 0.62
, mystery
Weight: 0.61
, myth
Weight: 0.61
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.83
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.73
, mathematics
Weight: 0.73
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, meteorology
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in technology 1.00
be in technology 0.96
be in technology related 0.92
be related to technology 0.91
be different from technology 0.91
affect technology 0.89
be difficult from technology 0.87
be very important in technology 0.87
relate to technology 0.86
contribute to technology 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(science, be used in technology)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be in technology)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to technology)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(science, be different from technology)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, affect technology)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(science, be difficult from technology)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(science, be very important in technology)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, relate to technology)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, contribute to technology)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, be in technology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, be related to technology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(science, affect technology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, relate to technology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, contribute to technology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, be in technology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(science, be related to technology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, be in technology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, affect technology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(science, be different from technology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, be related to technology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, relate to technology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(science, contribute to technology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, affect technology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(science, be difficult from technology)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(science, relate to technology)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(science, be very important in technology)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(science, contribute to technology)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(science, be different from technology)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(science, be different from technology)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(science, be difficult from technology)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(science, be very important in technology)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(science, be difficult from technology)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(science, be very important in technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be used in technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(science, be used in technology)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(science, be used in technology)