science: be very important in technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vocation
Weight: 0.62
, core
Weight: 0.62
, mystery
Weight: 0.61
, myth
Weight: 0.61
Siblings computer science
Weight: 0.83
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.73
, mathematics
Weight: 0.73
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.71
, meteorology
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be very important in technology 1.00
be in technology 0.88
be difficult from technology 0.87
be used in technology 0.87
be different from technology 0.85
be in technology related 0.84
affect technology 0.84
be related to technology 0.84
relate with technology 0.83
relate to technology 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(science, be very important in technology)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(science, be used in technology)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(science, be difficult from technology)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be in technology)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be used in technology)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, be in technology)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(science, be different from technology)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, affect technology)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, be in technology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to technology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(science, be used in technology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, relate with technology)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(science, be difficult from technology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, relate to technology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(science, affect technology)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, be related to technology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, relate with technology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(science, be different from technology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(science, be used in technology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(science, relate to technology)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, affect technology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(science, be related to technology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, relate with technology)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, be in technology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(science, relate to technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, affect technology)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, be related to technology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(science, relate with technology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(science, relate to technology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(science, be different from technology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(science, be different from technology)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(science, be difficult from technology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(science, be difficult from technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(science, be very important in technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(science, be very important in technology)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(science, be very important in technology)