seafood: be expensive in alaska

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.68
, fresh food
Weight: 0.65
, ingredient
Weight: 0.64
, meat
Weight: 0.62
, kitchen
Weight: 0.60
Siblings eel
Weight: 0.65
, shellfish
Weight: 0.37
, pet food
Weight: 0.37
, tuna
Weight: 0.37
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in alaska 1.00
be expensive in seattle 0.84
be popular in hawaii 0.82
be expensive in uk 0.81
be expensive in australia 0.79
be important to louisiana 0.79
be popular in japan 0.77
is expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fresh food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(kitchen, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(meat, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(kitchen, is expensive)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is expensive)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(kitchen, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(meat, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(tuna, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(eel, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fresh food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(kitchen, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lunch meat, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pet food, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(eel, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(eel, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(tuna, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tuna, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(shellfish, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(shellfish, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(seafood, be expensive in alaska)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(seafood, be popular in hawaii)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(seafood, be popular in hawaii)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be popular in hawaii)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(seafood, be popular in japan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(seafood, be popular in japan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be popular in japan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in seattle)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(seafood, be expensive in uk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(seafood, be popular in hawaii)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(seafood, be expensive in uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in uk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(seafood, be expensive in australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(seafood, be expensive in australia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(seafood, be popular in japan)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in uk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in australia)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(seafood, be important to louisiana)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(seafood, be important to louisiana)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be important to louisiana)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(seafood, be important to louisiana)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(seafood, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(seafood, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(seafood, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(seafood, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(seafood, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(seafood, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(seafood, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(seafood, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(kitchen, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fresh food, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(shellfish, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tuna, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lunch meat, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pet food, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(eel, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(meat, is expensive)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(kitchen, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fresh food, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(seafood, be expensive in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)