styrofoam: have impact on environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.62
, foam
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, container
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cardboard
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.34
, cardboard box
Weight: 0.34
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have impact on environment 1.00
have impact 0.93
affect environment 0.91
be harmful to environment 0.83
be bad for environment 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(foam, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(styrofoam, have impact on environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(foam, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(foam, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(plastic, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(foam, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(plastic, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(plastic, affect environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(plastic, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cardboard, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cardboard, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(styrofoam, have impact on environment)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(styrofoam, have impact)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, affect environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(styrofoam, affect environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(styrofoam, affect environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(styrofoam, have impact)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, affect environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, have impact)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be harmful to environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be harmful to environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be harmful to environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be harmful to environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(styrofoam, have impact on environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(foam, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(plastic, affect environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(plastic, be harmful to environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cardboard, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(foam, be bad for environment)