styrofoam: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.62
, foam
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, container
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cardboard
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.34
, cardboard box
Weight: 0.34
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
affect environment 0.87
be harmful to environment 0.86
have impact on environment 0.83
be good for modelling 0.81
has quality bad 0.80
be bad for earth 0.78
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(foam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(foam, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(container, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(foam, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(foam, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(foam, be bad for environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(container, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(foam, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plastic, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(plastic, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(plastic, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(foam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(foam, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(container, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(fiberglass, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(plastic, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(plastic, affect environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(plastic wrap, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(plastic, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cardboard, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(plastic, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(plastic, be harmful to environment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(plastic wrap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(plastic, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(plastic, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(cardboard, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(cardboard, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(plastic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(plastic, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fiberglass, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cardboard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cardboard, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(styrofoam, affect environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be harmful to environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, affect environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for earth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(styrofoam, affect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be good for modelling)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be harmful to environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(styrofoam, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(styrofoam, have impact on environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be harmful to environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be harmful to environment)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, affect environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, have impact on environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(foam, be bad for environment)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(foam, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(foam, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(plastic, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cardboard, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(plastic, be harmful to environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fiberglass, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(cardboard, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cardboard, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(foam, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(container, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(foam, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(styrofoam, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(foam, has quality good)