veal: be cheaper than beef

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.64
, meat
Weight: 0.58
, ingredient
Weight: 0.54
, item
Weight: 0.53
, dairy product
Weight: 0.51
Siblings steak
Weight: 0.37
, lamb
Weight: 0.37
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.36
, ravioli
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than beef 1.00
be more expensive than beef 0.96
be better than beef 0.94
be healthier than beef 0.91
be different to beef 0.90
be worse than lamb 0.80
is meat 0.80
be considered meat 0.79
is more expensive 0.78
is white meat 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(meat, is more expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(meat, is more expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be better than beef)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than beef)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(steak, is meat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dairy product, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(meat, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(steak, be more expensive than beef)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lamb, be better than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lamb, be better than beef)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(lamb, be healthier than beef)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(steak, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(steak, is meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(veal, be cheaper than beef)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(veal, be more expensive than beef)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(veal, be more expensive than beef)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(veal, be more expensive than beef)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(veal, is meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(veal, be considered meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(veal, is meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(veal, be more expensive than beef)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(veal, be considered meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(veal, be better than beef)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(veal, is white meat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(veal, is meat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(veal, is white meat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(veal, is white meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(veal, be healthier than beef)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(veal, be healthier than beef)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(veal, be healthier than beef)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(veal, be different to beef)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(veal, be better than beef)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(veal, be healthier than beef)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(veal, is more expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(veal, be considered meat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(veal, be different to beef)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(veal, be different to beef)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(veal, is more expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(veal, be better than beef)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(veal, be different to beef)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(veal, is white meat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(veal, is more expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(veal, is meat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(veal, be worse than lamb)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(veal, be better than beef)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(veal, be worse than lamb)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(veal, is more expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(veal, be considered meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(steak, be more expensive than beef)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(steak, is meat)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lamb, be better than beef)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lamb, be healthier than beef)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(meat, is more expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is more expensive)