veal: be worse than lamb

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.64
, meat
Weight: 0.58
, ingredient
Weight: 0.54
, item
Weight: 0.53
, dairy product
Weight: 0.51
Siblings steak
Weight: 0.37
, lamb
Weight: 0.37
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.36
, ravioli
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse than lamb 1.00
be better than beef 0.83
be more expensive than beef 0.80
be cheaper than beef 0.80
is meat 0.79
be healthier than beef 0.78
is white meat 0.78
be considered meat 0.78
be different to beef 0.77
be considered white meat 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be better than beef)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(steak, is meat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than beef)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(steak, is meat)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(steak, is meat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(steak, be more expensive than beef)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(steak, be more expensive than beef)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(lamb, be better than beef)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(lamb, be better than beef)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(lamb, be healthier than beef)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(lamb, be healthier than beef)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(veal, be worse than lamb)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(veal, is meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(veal, is meat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(veal, be considered meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(veal, be considered white meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(veal, be considered white meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(veal, be considered meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(veal, be considered white meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(veal, is white meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(veal, is white meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(veal, is meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(veal, is white meat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(veal, be more expensive than beef)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(veal, be more expensive than beef)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(veal, be better than beef)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(veal, be considered white meat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(veal, be considered meat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(veal, be more expensive than beef)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(veal, be cheaper than beef)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(veal, be more expensive than beef)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(veal, be cheaper than beef)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(veal, be cheaper than beef)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(veal, be better than beef)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(veal, is white meat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(veal, be healthier than beef)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(veal, be healthier than beef)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(veal, be healthier than beef)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(veal, be different to beef)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(veal, be cheaper than beef)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(veal, be different to beef)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(veal, is meat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(veal, be better than beef)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(veal, be different to beef)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(veal, be healthier than beef)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(veal, be different to beef)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(veal, be better than beef)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(veal, be considered meat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(veal, be worse than lamb)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(steak, is meat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lamb, be better than beef)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lamb, be more expensive than beef)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(steak, be more expensive than beef)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(veal, be worse than lamb)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lamb, be healthier than beef)