warehouse: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.67
, location
Weight: 0.65
, office building
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.60
Siblings office
Weight: 0.66
, cold storage
Weight: 0.64
, distributor
Weight: 0.61
, convenience store
Weight: 0.35
, factory
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality worth 0.85
has quality air 0.82
has quality price 0.80
has quality services 0.80
be good for business 0.80
has quality evil 0.78
be bad for environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(warehouse, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(location, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(warehouse, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(location, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(warehouse, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(location, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(location, has quality services)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(location, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(location, has quality wrong)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(location, be good for business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(location, has quality services)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(factory, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(factory, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(distributor, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(office, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(office, has quality air)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(distributor, has quality price)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(warehouse, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(location, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(warehouse, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(location, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(warehouse, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(office, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(office, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(distributor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(distributor, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(factory, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factory, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(office, has quality air) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(office, has quality air)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(distributor, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(distributor, has quality price)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(factory, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(factory, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(warehouse, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(warehouse, has quality worth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(warehouse, has quality worth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(warehouse, has quality worth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(warehouse, has quality evil)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(warehouse, has quality evil)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(warehouse, has quality evil)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality evil)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(warehouse, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(location, has quality wrong)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(location, has quality services)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(location, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(distributor, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(factory, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(distributor, has quality price)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(office, has quality air)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(office, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(factory, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(location, has quality wrong)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(location, has quality services)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(warehouse, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(location, be good for business)