warranty: has quality service

Related concepts

Parents	contract Weight: 0.64 , provision Weight: 0.60 , item Weight: 0.59 , factor Weight: 0.58
Siblings	supplier Weight: 0.58 , presentment Weight: 0.40 , lease Weight: 0.32 , household appliance Weight: 0.32 , deductible Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality service	1.00
has quality good	0.81
has quality better	0.80
has quality bad	0.79
has quality price	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(warranty, has quality service)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(warranty, has quality service)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(provision, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(warranty, has quality service)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(contract, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(warranty, has quality service)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(contract, has quality price)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(provision, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(provision, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality bad)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality price)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(lease, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(warranty, has quality service)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(contract, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(warranty, has quality service)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(provision, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(warranty, has quality service)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(contract, has quality price) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(warranty, has quality service)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(lease, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(lease, has quality better)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(lease, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(lease, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(warranty, has quality service)

Similarity expansion

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality bad)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.42

Salient(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(warranty, has quality bad)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(warranty, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

Typical(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(warranty, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Salient(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(warranty, has quality service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(provision, has quality bad)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(lease, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(deductible, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(lease, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.37

Typical(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.37

Typical(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.37

Typical(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(provision, has quality bad)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.37

Typical(warranty, has quality service) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)