wildlife: be important to us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, subject
Weight: 0.56
, attraction
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings geyser
Weight: 0.43
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, wetland
Weight: 0.35
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to us 1.00
be important for us 0.99
be important to life 0.80
be important for being 0.78
be important from quality 0.78
is good thing 0.78
be important for business 0.78
be important to environment 0.77
be important in business 0.77
be important for development of country 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(land, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to us)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(resource, be important for development of country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to us)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important to life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(resource, be important to life)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(resource, be important for development of country)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(land, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to life)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(land, be important in business)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for development of country)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important from quality)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(conservation, is good thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(resource, be important to life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(land, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to us)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(resource, be important for development of country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important to environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(conservation, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(conservation, is good thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(conservation, be important from quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important from quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important to us)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for us)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important for us)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important for being)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for us)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for us)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(wildlife, be important for being)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important for being)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important for being)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(resource, be important to life)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(resource, be important for development of country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(land, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(conservation, be important to environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(conservation, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(conservation, be important from quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(resource, be important to life)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(resource, be important for development of country)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wildlife, be important to us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(land, be important in business)