woodpecker: has physical part beaks

Related concepts

Parents	species Weight: 0.65 , wildlife Weight: 0.65 , creature Weight: 0.64 , bird Weight: 0.52
Siblings	chickadee Weight: 0.43 , peregrine falcon Weight: 0.37 , tree frog Weight: 0.37 , lizard Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has physical part beaks	1.00
have long beaks	0.94
need beaks	0.94
use beaks	0.94
need strong beaks	0.91
have sharp beaks	0.91
has physical part beak	0.88
have pointed beaks	0.88
have long beak	0.83
have pointed chisel like beaks	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beak)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beak)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(bird, has physical part beak) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(woodpecker, use beaks)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, use beaks)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(woodpecker, need beaks)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Salient(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beaks)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have sharp beaks)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beak)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(woodpecker, have pointed beaks)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(woodpecker, use beaks)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beak)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(woodpecker, need strong beaks)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beak)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beaks)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, need beaks)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beak)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have long beaks)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(woodpecker, have long beak)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(woodpecker, have pointed chisel like beaks)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, need strong beaks)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have pointed chisel like beaks)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have pointed beaks)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(woodpecker, have long beaks)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, need strong beaks)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have pointed chisel like beaks)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(woodpecker, have long beak)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(woodpecker, need beaks)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(woodpecker, need strong beaks)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(woodpecker, have pointed chisel like beaks)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have long beak)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(woodpecker, have pointed beaks)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, need beaks)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, have pointed beaks)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(woodpecker, have long beak)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.37

Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, use beaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Salient(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(woodpecker, has physical part beaks) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beak)