xor: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.53
, function
Weight: 0.46
, combination
Weight: 0.34
, difference
Weight: 0.34
, gate
Weight: 0.30
Siblings operating system
Weight: 0.27
, raid
Weight: 0.27
, extraction
Weight: 0.27
, distribution
Weight: 0.27
, business activity
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality difference 0.77
actually can improve business 0.77
has quality question 0.76
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(gate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(xor, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(gate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(xor, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(xor, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(difference, actually can improve business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(xor, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(xor, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(combination, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(xor, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(gate, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(difference, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(combination, has quality questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(gate, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(difference, actually can improve business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(gate, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(difference, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(gate, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(difference, actually can improve business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(combination, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(raid, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(extraction, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality question)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(gate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(xor, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(gate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(xor, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(xor, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(difference, actually can improve business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(xor, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(xor, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(combination, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(xor, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(operating system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(raid, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(raid, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(extraction, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(extraction, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(operating system, has quality question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality question)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(operating system, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(xor, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(xor, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(combination, has quality questions)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(difference, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gate, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(gate, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(difference, actually can improve business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(raid, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality question)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(extraction, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(gate, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(difference, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(gate, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(combination, has quality questions)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(xor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(difference, actually can improve business)