bias: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, voltage
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, influence
Weight: 0.58
Siblings prejudice
Weight: 0.60
, ignorance
Weight: 0.33
, distortion
Weight: 0.33
, hostility
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality plus 0.84
be in quality of life 0.83
has quality evil 0.78
has quality definition 0.76
be bad for business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(influence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(bias, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(influence, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(influence, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(prejudice, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(hostility, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(distortion, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(prejudice, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(prejudice, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ignorance, has quality evil)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(influence, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(bias, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(prejudice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(prejudice, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(inequality, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(hostility, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(hostility, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(prejudice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(prejudice, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(inequality, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(inequality, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(inequality, be in quality of life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(prejudice, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(prejudice, has quality wrong)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(distortion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(distortion, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ignorance, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ignorance, has quality evil)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(bias, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bias, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bias, has quality wrong)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bias, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bias, has quality wrong)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(bias, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(bias, has quality wrong)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(bias, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(influence, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(prejudice, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(hostility, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(prejudice, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(inequality, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(distortion, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(prejudice, has quality wrong)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(inequality, be in quality of life)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality wrong)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ignorance, has quality evil)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(bias, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(influence, has quality bad)