camel: interact in desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.64
, wild animal
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bactrian camel
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.35
, elephant
Weight: 0.35
, donkey
Weight: 0.35
, goat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
interact in desert 1.00
live in desert 0.88
be important to desert 0.87
be in desert 0.87
be important in desert 0.87
eat in desert 0.86
adapt to desert 0.86
adapt to desert environment 0.85
be good in desert 0.85
be better in desert 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(camel, interact in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(camel, eat in desert)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(camel, eat in desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(camel, eat in desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(camel, live in desert)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(camel, live in desert)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(camel, adapt to desert)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(camel, be in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important to desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(camel, be important in desert)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(camel, be better in desert)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(camel, be good in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(camel, eat in desert)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(camel, live in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(camel, live in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(camel, be in desert)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(camel, be better in desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(camel, be in desert)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(camel, be better in desert)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(camel, be in desert)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(camel, live in desert)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camel, be better in desert)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(camel, be good in desert)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(camel, adapt to desert)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camel, be good in desert)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(camel, adapt to desert)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(camel, adapt to desert)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(camel, be important in desert)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important in desert)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(camel, be good in desert)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(camel, be important to desert)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(camel, be important to desert)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(camel, be important in desert)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(camel, be important to desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camel, interact in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(camel, interact in desert)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(camel, interact in desert)