catcher: be in rye title

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infielder
Weight: 0.58
, pitch
Weight: 0.56
, position
Weight: 0.56
, need
Weight: 0.53
Siblings first baseman
Weight: 0.65
, shortstop
Weight: 0.36
, pitcher
Weight: 0.35
, quarterback
Weight: 0.33
, linebacker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in rye title 1.00
be in rye 0.92
was in rye 0.91
be in rye good 0.91
be in rye called 0.91
be in rye famous 0.91
be in rye bad 0.90
be in rye popular 0.90
be in rye matter 0.90
be in rye classic 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye title)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye called)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(catcher, was in rye)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye called)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye called)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye called)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(catcher, was in rye)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(catcher, was in rye)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(catcher, was in rye)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye matter)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye famous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye classic)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(catcher, be in rye popular)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye matter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(catcher, be in rye title)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(catcher, be in rye title)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(catcher, be in rye title)