connecticut: was established

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, town
Weight: 0.63
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was established 1.00
was formed 0.83
was founded 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was established)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(connecticut, was established)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(connecticut, was established)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(connecticut, was established)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(connecticut, was established)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(connecticut, was established)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(connecticut, was established)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(connecticut, was established)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was established)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was established)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new england, was founded)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was established)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was founded)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new england, was founded)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(washington, was established)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was established)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was founded)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, was founded)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was established)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was established)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was established)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was established)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was established)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was established)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was established)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was established)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(philadelphia, was established)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was established)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(washington, was established)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(washington, was established)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(las vegas, was founded)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(las vegas, was founded)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(maryland, was founded)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(maryland, was founded)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was founded)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(connecticut, was established)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(connecticut, was formed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(connecticut, was founded)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(connecticut, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was established)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was established)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(las vegas, was founded)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(washington, was established)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(maryland, was founded)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was founded)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was established)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(connecticut, was established)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded)