connecticut: was formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, town
Weight: 0.63
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formed 1.00
was established 0.83
was founded 0.81
was started 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was established)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(new york, was started)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was started)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new england, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was established)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was established)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was founded)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was started)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new england, was founded)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(new york, was started)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(washington, was established)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was established)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was started)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new york city, was started)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(massachusetts, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(new york, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(maryland, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(las vegas, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(las vegas, was founded)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(maryland, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(maryland, was founded)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(new york city, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(new york city, was started)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(philadelphia, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was established)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was founded)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(maryland, was started) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(maryland, was started)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(washington, was established) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(washington, was established)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(connecticut, was formed)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was started)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(connecticut, was established)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(connecticut, was started)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(connecticut, was founded)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was started)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(connecticut, was started)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was established)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(connecticut, was established)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new york, was started)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was started)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(new york city, was started)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(las vegas, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(maryland, was started)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was established)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(maryland, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was founded)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(washington, was established)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(new york, was started)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was started)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(connecticut, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was established)