connecticut: was founded

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, new england
Weight: 0.65
, town
Weight: 0.63
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.59
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, maryland
Weight: 0.36
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was founded 1.00
was formed 0.81
was established 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was established)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(new england, was founded)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(new york, was founded)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(new york, was formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(new york, was established)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was established)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was founded)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was established)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(new england, was founded)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was founded)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was formed)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(new york, was established)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new york, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(washington, was established)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, was established)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, was founded)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(maryland, was formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was founded)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(new york, was founded)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(new england, was founded)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(massachusetts, was established)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(massachusetts, was formed)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(new york, was formed)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(new york, was established)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was founded)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(las vegas, was founded)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(las vegas, was founded)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(maryland, was founded)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(maryland, was founded)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(philadelphia, was founded)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was founded)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(maryland, was formed)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(maryland, was formed)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(philadelphia, was established)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, was established)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(washington, was established)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(washington, was established)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(connecticut, was founded)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(connecticut, was formed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(connecticut, was formed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was formed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(connecticut, was established)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(connecticut, was established)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(connecticut, was established)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was established)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(connecticut, was founded)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was established)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(las vegas, was founded)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(maryland, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(maryland, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was founded)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(philadelphia, was established)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(washington, was established)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(new england, was founded)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(new york, was founded)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was founded)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(new york, was formed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was formed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(new york, was established)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(connecticut, was founded)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(massachusetts, was established)