cost: has quality function

Related concepts

Parents	operating expense Weight: 0.70 , burden Weight: 0.63 , estimate Weight: 0.63 , variable Weight: 0.62
Siblings	income tax Weight: 0.69 , deductible Weight: 0.65 , tuition Weight: 0.64 , fee Weight: 0.64 , overhead Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality function	1.00
has quality good	0.78
has quality bad	0.76
has quality cost	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(variable, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(cost, has quality function)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(operating expense, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(cost, has quality function)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(variable, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(cost, has quality function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(variable, has quality cost)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(operating expense, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(variable, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality cost)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality good)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(operating expense, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(cost, has quality function)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(variable, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(cost, has quality function)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(variable, has quality cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(cost, has quality function)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(tuition, has quality bad)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(tuition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(tuition, has quality good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(cost, has quality function)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(cost, has quality function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(operating expense, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(income tax, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(tuition, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(deductible, has quality bad)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(tuition, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(operating expense, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.11

Typical(cost, has quality function) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)